Efecto de la inversión extranjera directa en el consumo de energía renovable para 18 países de América Latina

Barra lateral del artículo

PDF HTML
Publicado: mar. 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54753/rve.v10i1.1297

Contenido principal del artículo

Edwin Jiménez
Carrera de Economía, Universidad Nacional de Loja, Loja, Ecuador
Jessica Guamán
Carrera de Economía, Universidad Nacional de Loja, Loja, Ecuador

Resumen

La presente investigación evalúa la relación entre la inversión extranjera directa y consumo de energía renovable en 18 países de América Latina durante el periodo de 1990-2015. Se aplicó un modelo econométrico de Mínimos Cuadrados Generalizados (GLS) con datos panel, una prueba de Westerlum (2007) para determinar si existe cointegración en el largo plazo, y también una prueba de Granger (1969) para establecer causalidad entre las variables. Los principales resultados, demuestran que la Inversión Extranjera Directa (IED) tiene un efecto positivo en el consumo de energía renovable a nivel de América Latina, Países de Ingresos Medios Altos (PIMA) y Países de Ingresos Medios Bajos (PIMB). Sin embargo, los Países de Ingresos Altos (PIA) tienen un efecto negativo y estadísticamente no significativo. Las pruebas de cointegración de Westerlund (2007), demostraron la existencia de vectores de cointegración en el largo plazo entre la inversión extranjera directa y el consumo de energía renovable. Las pruebas de causalidad de Dumitrescu-Hurlin demostraron que existe causalidad bidireccional para los 18 países de América Latina y PIA. Las implicaciones deben estar orientadas al tema de los impuestos sobre la IED para atraer empresas internacionales a países donde es casi nula para lograr aumentar el consumo de energía renovable.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Jiménez, E. ., & Guamán, J. . (2022). Efecto de la inversión extranjera directa en el consumo de energía renovable para 18 países de América Latina. Revista Económica, 10(1), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.54753/rve.v10i1.1297
Número
Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2022): RVE Vol 10 (Enero-Junio 2022)
Sección
ARTÍCULOS DE INVESTIGACIÓN
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Esta obra está sujeta a la licencia Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional de Creative
Commons. Para ver una copia de esta licencia, visite http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Citas

Adams, S. (2008). Globalization and income inequality: Implications for intellectual property rights. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(5), 725–735.

Adom, P. K., Opoku, E. E. O., & Yan, I. K. M. (2019). Energy demand–FDI nexus in Africa: Do FDIs induce dichotomous paths? Energy Economics, 81, 928–941.

Alam, A., Malik, I. A., Abdullah, A. Bin, Hassan, A., Faridullah, Awan, U., Ali, G., Zaman, K., & Naseem, I. (2015). Does financial development contribute to SAARC’S energy demand? from energy crisis to energy reforms. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 818–829.

Albulescu, C. T., Tiwari, A. K., Yoon, S. M., & Kang, S. H. (2019). FDI, income, and environmental pollution in Latin America: Replication and extension using panel quantiles regression analysis. Energy Economics, 84(xxxx), 104504.

Anwar, A., Siddique, M., Eyup Dogan, & Sharif, A. (2021). The moderating role of renewable and non-renewable energy in environment-income nexus for ASEAN countries: Evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression. Renewable Energy, 164, 956–967.

Azam, M., Khan, A. Q., Zaman, K., & Ahmad, M. (2015). Factors determining energy consumption: Evidence from Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 1123–1131.

Bersalli, G., Menanteau, P., & El-Methni, J. (2020). Renewable energy policy effectiveness: A panel data analysis across Europe and Latin America. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 133(August 2019).

Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Advances in Econometrics, 15, 161–177.

Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239.

Dogan, E., Altinoz, B., Madaleno, M., & Taskin, D. (2020). The impact of renewable energy consumption to economic growth: A replication and extension of Inglesi-Lotz (2016). Energy Economics, 90, 104866.

Doytch, N., & Narayan, S. (2016). Does FDI influence renewable energy consumption? An analysis of sectoral FDI impact on renewable and non-renewable industrial energy consumption. Energy Economics, 54, 291–301.

Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460.

Enders, W., Chung, P., Shao, L., & Yuan, J. (2002). Instructor’s Resource Guide To Accompany Applied Econometric Time Series (2nd Edition). Wiley India Pvt. Limited, 2008, 480.

Eskeland, G. S., & Harrison, A. E. (2003). Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 70(1), 1–23.

Fadly, D. (2019). Low-carbon transition: Private sector investment in renewable energy projects in developing countries. World Development, 122, 552–569.

Fan, W., & Hao, Y. (2020). An empirical research on the relationship amongst renewable energy consumption, economic growth and foreign direct investment in China. Renewable Energy, 146, 598–609.

Granger, C. W. J. (2008). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods. Essays in Econometrics Vol II: Collected Papers of Clive W. J. Granger, 37(3), 31–47.

Hanif, I., Faraz Raza, S. M., Gago-de-Santos, P., & Abbas, Q. (2019). Fossil fuels, foreign direct investment, and economic growth have triggered CO2 emissions in emerging Asian economies: Some empirical evidence. Energy, 171, 493–501.

Hausman. (1978). Specification Testing. 46(6), 73–101.

Herrerias, M. J., Cuadros, A., & Orts, V. (2013). Energy intensity and investment ownership across Chinese provinces. Energy Economics, 36, 286–298.

Ibrahiem, D. M. (2015). Renewable Electricity Consumption, Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in Egypt: An ARDL Approach. Procedia Economics and Finance, 30(15), 313–323.

Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74.

Ji, Q., & Zhang, D. (2019). How much does financial development contribute to renewable energy growth and upgrading of energy structure in China? Energy Policy, 128(71573214), 114–124.

Jiang, X., Zhu, K., & Wang, S. (2015). The potential for reducing China’s carbon dioxide emissions: Role of foreign-invested enterprises. Global Environmental Change, 35, 22–30.

Keeley, A. R., & Ikeda, Y. (2017). Determinants of foreign direct investment in wind energy in developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 1451–1458.

Khan, M. A., Khan, M. Z., Zaman, K., Irfan, D., & Khatab, H. (2014). Questing the three key growth determinants: Energy consumption, foreign direct investment and financial development in South Asia. Renewable Energy, 68, 203–215.

Koengkan, M., Fuinhas, J. A., & Marques, A. C. (2019). The relationship between financial openness, renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in the Latin American countries: An approach with a panel vector auto regression model. In The Extended Energy-Growth Nexus: Theory and Empirical Applications. Elsevier Inc.

Lee, J. W. (2013). The contribution of foreign direct investment to clean energy use, carbon emissions and economic growth. Energy Policy, 55, 483–489. ¿

Lopez, L., & Weber, S. (2017). Testing for Granger causality in panel data. Stata Journal, 17(4), 972–984.

Mert, M., & Bölük, G. (2016). Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO2 emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(21), 21669–21681.

Mielnik, O., & Goldemberg, J. (2002). Foreign direct investment and decoupling between energy and gross domestic product in developing countries. Energy Policy, 30(2), 87–89.

Muhammad, B., & Khan, S. (2019). Effect of bilateral FDI, energy consumption, CO2 emission and capital on economic growth of Asia countries. Energy Reports, 5, 1305–1315.

Neves, S. A., Marques, A. C., & Patrício, M. (2020). Determinants of CO2 emissions in European Union countries: Does environmental regulation reduce environmental pollution? Economic Analysis and Policy, 68, 114–125.

Nguyen, K. H., & Kakinaka, M. (2019). Renewable energy consumption, carbon emissions, and development stages: Some evidence from panel cointegration analysis. Renewable Energy, 132, 1049–1057.

Paramati, S. R., Mo, D., & Gupta, R. (2017). The effects of stock market growth and renewable energy use on CO2 emissions: Evidence from G20 countries. Energy Economics, 66, 360–371.

Persyn, D. (2008). Error-correction – based cointegration tests for. 2, 232–241.

Qamruzzaman, M., & Jianguo, W. (2020). The asymmetric relationship between financial development, trade openness, foreign capital flows, and renewable energy consumption: Fresh evidence from panel NARDL investigation. Renewable Energy, 159, 827–842.

Rafindadi, A. A., Muye, I. M., & Kaita, R. A. (2018). The effects of FDI and energy consumption on environmental pollution in predominantly resource-based economies of the GCC. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 25(December 2017), 126–137.

Salim, R., Yao, Y., Chen, G., & Zhang, L. (2017). Can foreign direct investment harness energy consumption in China? A time series investigation. Energy Economics, 66, 43–53.

Sarkodie, S. A., Adams, S., & Leirvik, T. (2020). Foreign direct investment and renewable energy in climate change mitigation: Does governance matter? Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121262.

Sarkodie, S. A., & Strezov, V. (2019). Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Science of the Total Environment, 646, 862–871.

Sirin, S. M. (2017). Foreign direct investments (FDIs) in Turkish power sector: A discussion on investments, opportunities and risks. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78(September 2016), 1367–1377.

Smolović, J. C., Muhadinović, M., Radonjić, M., & Đurašković, J. (2020). How does renewable energy consumption affect economic growth in the traditional and new member states of the European Union? Energy Reports, 6(June), 505–513.

Teixeira, A. A. C., Forte, R., & Assunção, S. (2017). Do countries’ endowments of non-renewable energy resources matter for FDI attraction? A panel data analysis of 125 countries over the period 1995–2012. International Economics, 150, 57–71.

Wang, Q., & Wang, L. (2020). Renewable energy consumption and economic growth in OECD countries: A nonlinear panel data analysis. Energy, 207, 118200.

Washburn, C., & Pablo-Romero, M. (2019). Measures to promote renewable energies for electricity generation in Latin American countries. Energy Policy, 128(December 2018), 212–222.

Westerlund, J., & Edgerton, D. L. (2007). A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Economics Letters, 97(3), 185–190.

Wooldridge. (2002). Wooldridge_Panel_Data_Chapters.pdf.

Xu, C., Zhao, W., Zhang, M., & Cheng, B. (2021). Pollution haven or halo? The role of the energy transition in the impact of FDI on SO2 emissions. Science of the Total Environment, 763, 143002.

Yilanci, V., Ozgur, O., & Gorus, M. S. (2019). The asymmetric effects of foreign direct investment on clean energy consumption in BRICS countries: A recently introduced hidden cointegration test. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117786.

Zafar, M. W., Qin, Q., malik, M. N., & Zaidi, S. A. H. (2020). Foreign direct investment and education as determinants of environmental quality: The importance of post Paris Agreement (COP21). Journal of Environmental Management, 270(December 2019), 110827.

Zhang, C., & Zhou, X. (2016). Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 943–951.