Modelos de gobernanza y continuidad en la empresa familiar

Contenido principal del artículo

Rodolfo García Araoz
María de los Angeles Lucero Bringas

Resumen

El propósito de este artículo es presentar los resultados de la primera etapa de una investigación sobre los factores que afectan  la continuidad de la empresa familiar. En esta etapa se realizó un estudio exploratorio, bajo un enfoque cualitativo, se hicieron lecturas y  se condujeron entrevistas personales semi-directivas. Para el análisis de la información extraída se aplicaron técnicas de análisis cualitativos, especialmente el “análisis de contenido”. Como resultado se presentan cuatro hipótesis y un modelo integrador sobre la gobernanza de la empresa familiar. Se concluye que el modelo permite aumentar la comprensión de los factores que afectan la continuidad de la empresa familiar y que es un aporte necesario, que llena un espacio vacío, dado que la mayor parte de los conocimientos existentes son producto de estudios realizados en países económicamente desarrollados y con diferencias institucionales significativas con relación a las naciones latinoamericanas.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
García Araoz, R. ., & Lucero Bringas, M. de los A. (2023). Modelos de gobernanza y continuidad en la empresa familiar. Sur Academia: Revista Académica-Investigativa De La Facultad Jurídica, Social Y Administrativa, 10(19). https://doi.org/10.54753/suracademia.v10i19.1605
Sección
Artículos de Investigación científica y tecnológica

Citas

Argyris, C. (1973a). Organization man: Rational and self-actualizing. Public Administration Review, 33 (July/August): 354-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/975115

Astrachan, J. y Kolenko, T. (1994). A Neglected Factor Explaining Family Business Success: Human Resource Practices. Family Business Review, 7 (3), 251-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1994.00251.x

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (2006). Memorando: Promover la supervivencia y competitividad de las empresas familiares de la Región Centro – (AR-M1020) Argentina.

Barber, B. y Buehler, C. (1996). Family cohesion and enmeshment: different constructs, different effects. Journal of marriage and family, 58 (2), 433-441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/353507

Basly S. and Saunier P. (2019). Family member’s commitment to the firm and family business continuity: investigating the mediating role of family to firm identity and emotional attachment. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Htpps://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1551458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1551458

Bendickson J., Muldoon J., Liguori E. ando Davis P. (2016). "Agency theory: the times, they are a-changin’", Management Decision, Vol. 54 Iss 1 pp. 174 - 193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2015-0058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2015-0058

Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., & Litz, R.A. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 28(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00049.x

Corbetta, G., & Salvato, C. (2004). Self-serving or self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on “Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 355–362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00050.x

Davis J., James H., Schoorman D. and Donaldson L. (1997). Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/259223

Donaldson L. and Davis J. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management 16: 49. DOI: 10.1177/031289629101600103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103

Drozdow N. (1998). What is continuity? Center for Applied Research. Family Business Review, vol. XI, no. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1998.00337.x

Dyer W. (1998). Culture and Continuity in Family Firms. The Best of FBR II

Eisenhardt K. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 14, No. 1, 57-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003

Filatotchev I. (2008). Developing an organizational theory of corporate governance: comments on Henry L. Tosi, Jr. ‘‘Quo Vadis? Suggestions for future corporate governance research’’. J Manage Gov 12:171–178. DOI 10.1007/s10997-008-9055-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-008-9055-8

Franco-Santos M., Nalick M., Rivera-Torres P. and Gomez-Mejia L. (2017). Governance and Well-being in Academia: Negative Consequences of Applying an Agency Theory Logic in Higher Education. British Journal of Management, Vol. 00, 1–20 (2017). DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12249

García Alvarez E. and López Sintas J. (2003). Coherence between values and successor socialization: facilitating family business continuity. Chair of Family Business. IESE Business School - Universidad de Navarra. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.459202

Gersick, K. E., & Feliu, N. (2014). Governing the family enterprise: Practices, performance, and research. In L. Melin, M. Nordqvist, & P. Sharma (Eds.), SAGE handbook of family business (pp. 196-225). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247556.n11

Gersick, K., Lansberg, I. y Desjardins, M. y Dunn, B. (1999). Family Business Review, 12 (4), 287-297. http://fbr.sagepub.com DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00287.x

Gimeno Sandig, A. (2009). El desempeño de la empresa familiar: un estudio causal de los factores y variables internas (tesis doctoral). ESADE, España.

Gómez Mejía L. and Wiseman R. (2007). Does agency theory have universal relevance? A reply to Lubatkin, Lane, Collin, and Very. Journal of Organizational Behaviour. 28, 81–88 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.407

Gómez-Mejía L., Haynes T., Núñez-Nickell M., Jacobson K. y Moyano Fuentes J. (2007). Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family- controlled firms: evidence from Spanish olive mills, Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, (1), 106-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106

Jensen M. and Meckling W. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (1976) 305-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Kallmuenzer A. (2018). Agency theory and the family business in Theoretical perspectives on family businesses.

Konopaski M., Jack S. and Hamilton E. (2015). How Family Business Members Learn About Continuity. Academy of Management and Education. Vol 14 No 3, 347-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2014.0244

Kultys, J. (2016). Controversies about Agency Theory as Theoretical Basis for Corporate Governance. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(4), 613-634. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/OeC. 2016.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2016.034

Lambrecht J. and Lievens J. (2008). Pruning the Family Tree: An Unexplored Path to Family Business Continuity and Family Harmony. Family Business Review, vol. XXI, no. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865080210040103

Lee, J. (2006). Family Firm Performance: Further Evidence. Family Business Review, 19 (2), 103-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00060.x

Lim E., Lubatkin M. y Wiseman R. (2010). A Family Firm Variant of the Behavioral Agency Theory. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4: 197–211 (2010). DOI: 10.1002/sej.91 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.91

Lubatkin M., Schulze W., Ling Y. and Dino R. (2005). The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family-managed firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 313–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.307

Lubatkin, M., Lane, P. J., Collin, S., & Very, P. (2007). An embeddedness framing of governance and opportunism: Towards a cross-nationally accommodating theory of agency. Journal of Organizational Behavior. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.402

Lucky, E., Minai, M. y Isaiah, A. (2011). A conceptual framework of family business succession: bane of family business continuity. International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 2, Nº 18.

Luis R. Gomez-Mejia, Cristina Cruz, Pascual Berrone & Julio De Castro. (2011). The Bind that Ties: Socioemotional Wealth Preservation in Family Firms, The Academy of Management Annals, 5:1, 653-707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.593320

Martinez Echezárraga J. (2010). Empresas Familiares Reto al Destino – Granica – Buenos Aires.

McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of the enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Melin L., Nordqvist M. y Sharma P. (2014). The Sage Handbook of Family Business, Los Angeles, Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247556

Merchant P., Kumar A. and Mallik D. (2017). Factors Influencing Family Business Continuity in Indian Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). Journal of Family and Economic Issues. Https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-017-9562-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-017-9562-3

Norton, D. y Kaplan, R. (2009). El cuadro de mando integral, Barcelona, España: Grupo Planeta

OCDE-CAF (2019). Resumen Ejecutivo. Índice de Políticas PYME: América Latina y el Caribe 2019 Políticas para PYMEs competitivas en la Alianza del Pacífico y países participantes de América del Sur

Poza E and Messer T. (2001). Spousal Leadership and Continuity in the Family Firm. FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, vol. XIV, no. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00025.x

Salvato C., Chirico F. and Sharma P. (2010). Championing exit and continuity in entrepreneurial family firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development Vol 22, Nos. 3-4, 341-348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985621003726192

Schulze W., Lubatkin M. y Dino R. (2002). Altruism, Agency, and the Competitiveness of Family Firms, Managerial and Decision Economics, DOI: 10.1002/mde.1064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1064

Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz,A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.99.10114

Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M., & Dino, R. (2003). Dispersion of ownership and agency in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 179–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30040613

Sharma, P. (2004). An Overview of the Field of Family Business Studies: Current Status and Directions for the Future. Family Business Review, 23 (1), 1-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00001.x

Tagiuri, R. y Davis, J. (1992). On the goals of successful family companies. Family Business Review, 5 (1), 43-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1992.00043.x

Ulhoi J. (2007). Revisiting the principal-agent theory of agency: comments on the firm-level and cross-national embeddedness theses. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 28, 75–80 (2007) DOI: 10.1002/job.405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.405

Van den Berghe L. and Carchon S. (2003). Agency Relations within the Family Business System: an exploratory approach. Corporate Gobernance, Volume 11 Number 3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00316

Venter E, Van der Merwe S & Farrington S (2012). The impact of selected stakeholders on family business continuity and family harmony. Southern African Business Review Volume 16 Number 2

Wiseman R., Cuevas-Rodríguez G. and Gomez-Mejia L. (2012) Towards a Social Theory of Agency. Journal of Management Studies 49:1, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011. 01016.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01016.x

Zellweger T., Mühlebach C. and Sieger P. (2010). How much and what kind of entrepreneurial orientation is needed for family business continuity? Center for Family Business University of St. Gallen.