Development of a Software Product Lifecycle Management Framework Using Process Innovation Models: Literature Review

Authors

  • Paula Mercedes Alvarez Carrión Dirección General de Tecnologías de la Información y Transformación Digital, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador
  • Samanta Patricia Cueva Carrión Ciencias de la Computación y Electrónica, Facultad de Ingenierías y Arquitectura, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54753/cedamaz.v13i1.1261

Keywords:

Innovation, SDLC, Software development life cycle, Process Innovation Models, Systematic literature review

Abstract

Innovation is the most relevant activity that adds value to companies and improves their competitiveness. In this context, software applications have taken great relevance as tools that support the strategy and operations of companies. Consequently, software engineering and innovation are two branches that must align and complement each other to meet current challenges. In this study, articles that address the methods implemented in the development of software products and that are considered innovation methods are analyzed. The method used is the systematic literature review (SLR) of 42 articles published within the last 5 years in the scientific databases Scopus, Springer Link, ResearchGate, EBSCO, and Proquest. Inclusion and exclusion criteria, relevance, quality assessment, and validity of the studies were considered. The findings reflect the activities that are considered innovative in the software development cycle and it is concluded that the challenges open possibilities for the inclusion of artificial intelligence in different phases of the cycle.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S. (2014): Augmented Reality Trends in Education : A Systematic Review of Research and Applications. 17, 133–149.

Baum, T., Liskin, O., Niklas, K., & Schneider, K. (2016). Factors influencing code review processes in industry. Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, 13-18-Nove, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1145/2950290.2950323

Borba, Alexandre & Batista, Glauber & Souza, Ricardo. (2016). InnoStartup - a Toolbox for Innovation in Software Development Process. IEEE Latin America Transactions. 14. 3875-3885. 10.1109/TLA.2016.7786375.

Clarke, P. M., Calafat, A. L. M., Ekert, D., Ekstrom, J. J., Gornostaja, T., Jovanovic, M., Johansen, J., Mas, A., Messnarz, R., Villar, B. N., O’connor, A., O’connor, R. V., Reiner, M., Sauberer, G., Schmitz, K. D., & Yilmaz, M. (2016). Refactoring software development process terminology through the use of ontology. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 633, 47–57.

Correia, A. M., Mesquita, A., & Paulos, A. (2010). No Title. Projectics / Proyéctica / Projectique, 4(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.3917/proj.004.0039

Eito-Brun, R. (2017). Incorporating innovation management practices to ISO/IEC 29110. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 748, 15–25.

Eito-Brun, R.,&Sicilia, M. A. (2017). An innovation activity model for Very Small Entities in the software sector: an empirical study. R and D Management, 47(5), E13–E25. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.1222

Furfaro, A., Gallo, T., Garro, A., Saccà, D., & Tundis, A. (2016). ResDevOps: A Software Engineering Framework for Achieving Long-Lasting Complex Systems. Proceedings - 2016 IEEE 24th International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2016, July 2019, 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2016.15

Idrus, H. M., & Ali, N. (2019). Tacit knowledge in software testing: A systematic review. International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems, ICRIIS, December-2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRIIS48246.2019.9073275

Kitchenham, B. (2004): Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews.

Lucio-Villegas, E. (2021). La metodología Design Thinking para la innovación y centrada en la persona. January.

Milojkovic, J., Ciric, V., & Rancic, D. (2020). Design and Implementation of Cluster Based Parallel System for Software Testing. 2020 Zooming Innovation in Consumer Technologies Conference, ZINC 2020, 276–279. https://doi.org/10.1109/ZINC50678.2020.9161436

Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R. & Sanders, B. (2007): Social innovation: what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated, The Young Foundation, London.

Oberhauser, R., & Stigler, S. (2017). Microflows: Enabling agile business process modeling to orchestrate semantically-annotated microservices. BMSD 2017- Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design, Bmsd, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006527100190028

Pater, J., Lie-Tjauw, S., Gonzalez, M., Kim, M., Isbell, S., & Severson, D. (2018). Advancing the agile software process: The case of modernizing the army community service’s information technology infrastructure. WMSCI 2018 - 22nd World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Proceedings, 1, 143–148

Torres-Carrión, P., Gonzalez, C. (2018): Gesture-Based Children Computer Interaction for Inclusive Education : A Systematic Literature Review. 1, 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05532-5.

Xiaolong, H., Huiqi, Z., Lunchao, Z., Nazir, S., Jun, D., & Khan, A. S. (2021). Soft Computing and Decision Support System for Software Process Improvement: A Systematic Literature Review. Scientific Programming, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7295627

Xie, Y., Li, Z., & Li, H. (2020). Analysis of Software Development Process Based on Software Components. Proceedings of 2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Applications, ICAICA 2020, 625–628.

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Alvarez Carrión, P. M., & Cueva Carrión, S. P. (2023). Development of a Software Product Lifecycle Management Framework Using Process Innovation Models: Literature Review. CEDAMAZ, 13(1), 122–125. https://doi.org/10.54753/cedamaz.v13i1.1261

Issue

Section

Review articles