From Correísmo to Anti-Correísmo. Radicalization, polarization and political change in Ecuador.

Main Article Content

Israel Celi Toledo

Abstract

This article seeks to explain the crisis of the correísta regime in Ecuador. Through a qualitative case study focused on the analysis of political interactions and causal mechanisms, we seek to contribute to the understanding of radical political changes and institutional instability in Ecuador. The investigation evidences that correísmo dominated the Ecuadorian politics during a decade, thanks to the impulse of the anti-pactist constitutionalism, polarizing to interest groups, social movements and political actors against him. These actors worked together to force a crisis within the correísmo in a moment of economic recession. Arose like this a new radical change in Ecuador, marked by the rise of anti-correísmo and the permanence of a polarizing political scene.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Celi Toledo, I. (2020). From Correísmo to Anti-Correísmo. Radicalization, polarization and political change in Ecuador. Sur Academia: Revista Académica-Investigativa De La Facultad Jurídica, Social Y Administrativa, 7(13). Retrieved from https://revistas.unl.edu.ec/index.php/suracademia/article/view/697
Section
Artículos de Revisión

References

Acosta Alberto y John Cajas Guijarro, Una década desperdiciada. Las sombras del correísmo, Quito, CAAP, 2018.

Bejarano, Ana María; Segura, Renata. Asambleas constituyentes y democracia: una lectura crítica del nuevo constitucionalismo en la región Andina. Colombia Internacional, núm. 79, septiembre-diciembre, 2013, pp. 19-48, p.44

Borja, María Sol; The New York Times en español: https://www.nytimes.com/es/2018/07/25/opinion-ecuador-rafael-correa-prision/

Brewer-Carías, Allan R., Golpe de Estado y Proceso Constituyente en Venezuela, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D. F., 2001, pp.347.

Cas Mudde & Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the Contemporary and Future Research Agenda, Comparative Political Studies, november 2018, Volume: 51 issue: 13, page(s): 1667-1693, p.14.

De la Torre, Carlos. 2013. "El tecnopopulismo de Rafael Correa. ¿Es compatible el carisma con la tecnocracia?". Latin American Research Review 48(1): 24-43.

Eaton, Kent; The Centralism of ‘Twenty-First-Century Socialism’: Recentralising Politics in Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia. Journal of Latin American Studies, Cambridge University Press, 2013, 45,

Montúfar, César; La dictadura plebiscitaria. Neoconstitucionalismo y construcción de un nuevo Régimen Político El Ecuador a inicios del Siglo XXI, Quito, Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Informe de Investigación, 2018. P.37.

Peruzzoti, Enrique; “Emergencia, desarrollo, crisis y reconstrucción de la sociedad civil argentina”, en Sociedad civil, esfera pública y democratización en América Latina: Andes y Cono Sur, coord. Aldo Panfichi (México, D.F.: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú/ Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2002), p. 98.

Wolff, Jonas; Business Power and the Politics of Postneoliberalism: Relations Between Governments and Economic Elites in Bolivia and Ecuador, LATIN AMERICAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY 58: 2 ,2016 University of Miami, DOI: 10.1111/