Potential forest species as agroforestry components on Coffea arabica L., farms at two altitudinal levels in the Palanda canton

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54753/cedamaz.v15i1.2368

Keywords:

Agroforestry, Altitudinal levels, Ecosystem services, Landscape restoration

Abstract

The cultivation of Coffea arabica in the Palanda canton, Zamora Chinchipe province, is practiced on several coffee farmsin association with various tree species. This study evaluated tree species as potential agroforestry components associated with Coffeaarabica at two altitudinal levels in the Palanda canton. Eight farms were selected, four at lower altitudes and four at higher altitudes. Allindividuals with a diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥ 5 cm were measured. Por each species, biological and socioeconomic benefits wereidentified using the importance coefficient, after which species were evaluated and grouped into four suitability categories. The floristiccomposition associated with C. arabica cultivation comprised 26 species and 337 individuals at higher altitudes, and, 30 species and 231individuals al lower altitudes. The diversity was moderate, with no significant differences in floristic composition between altitudinal levels.Fifteen species with the greatest ecological and socioeconomic benefits were identified: 10 at higher altitudes, two at lower altitudes, andthree common to both levels. Twenty-two percent of the species were deemed highly suitable, and 32 % were considered appropriate as apotential components of agroforestry systems associated with C. arabica. The recorded composition and diversity on coffee farms wereessential for the ecological stability, resilience and, sustainability of agroforestry systems. Fruit species emerged as the most ecologicallyvaluable, while fruit and timber species were identified as potential agroforestry components, guaranteeing a variety of ecological andsocioeconomic benefits for agroforestry systems.

References

Castillo-Angulo, K. D., Rincón-Bravo, K. L., Yela-Lara, S. del M., y Ordóñez-Jurado, H. R. (2021). Especies forestales con potencial agroforestal en el Consejo Comunitario Alto Mira y Frontera (Tumaco, Colombia). https://dx.doi.org/10.14482/inde.39.1.634.99

Celi-Delgado, L., y Aguirre-Mendoza, Z. (2022). Caracterización de los sistemas agroforestales tradicionales de la parroquia Zumba, cantón Chinchipe, Ecuador.

Chemeda, B. A., Wakjira, F. S., y Hizikias, E. B. (2022). Tree diversity and biomass carbon stock analysis along altitudinal gradients in coffee-based agroforestry system of Western Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 8(1), 2123767. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2022.2123767

Correia, M., Diabaté, M., Beavogui, P., Guilavogui, K., Lamanda, N., y de Foresta, H. (2010). Conserving forest tree diversity in Guinée Forestière (Guinea, West Africa): The role of coffee-based agroforests. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(6), 1725–1747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9800-6

Escobar, F., Lobo, J., y Halffter, G. (2005). Altitudinal variation of dung beetle (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) assemblages in the Colombian Andes. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822X.2005.00161.x

Farfán-Valencia, F. (2014). Agroforestería y sistemas agroforestales con café. 342

Fischer, M., Weyand, A., Rudmann-Maurer, K., y Stöcklin, J. (2011). Adaptation of Poa alpina to altitude and land use in the Swiss Alps. Alpine Botany, 121(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-011-0096-2

GAD Palanda, P. (2020). PLAN DE DESARROLLO Y ORDENAMIENTO TERRITORIAL

Muñoz, D. A., Calvache M., D., y Yela, J. F. (2013). Especies forestales con potencial agroforestal para las zonas altas en el Departamento de Nariño.

Nair, P. K. R. (2011). Agroforestry Systems and Environmental Quality: Introduction. Journal of Environmental Quality, 40(3), 784–790. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0076

Ponce Vaca, L. A., Orellana Suarez, K. D., Acuña Velásquez, sidro R., Alfonso Alemán, J. L., y Fuentes Figueroa, T. (2018). Situación de la caficultura ecuatoriana: Perspectivas. 15(1), 307-325

Ramos-Veintimilla, R., Nieto, C., y Galarza-Rosales, J. (2005). La agroforestería una alternativa productiva y ambiental para la sierra ecuatoriana.

Romero Mejía, A. (2005). Propuesta metodológica para seleccionar especies pioneras leñosas con fines de restauración ecológica, dentro de la Reserva Biológica Cachalú (Encio-Santander). 9.

Tesfay, F., Moges, Y., y Asfaw, Z. (2022). Woody Species Composition, Structure, and Carbon Stock of Coffee-Based Agroforestry System along an Elevation Gradient in the Moist Mid-Highlands of Southern Ethiopia. International Journal of Forestry Research, 2022(1), 4729336. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4729336

Torquebiau, E. (2024). Tropical Forest Issues. http://doi.org/10.55515/OEQC4236

Vaca, L. A. P., Velázquez, I. R. A., Ponce, P. P., y Suárez, K. D. O. (2018). El sistema agroforestal cafetalero. Su importancia para la seguridad agroalimentaria y nutricional en Ecuador. 6

Valencia, V., García-Barrios, L., West, P., Sterling, E. J., y Naeem, S. (2014). The role of coffee agroforestry in the conservation of tree diversity and community composition of native forests in a Biosphere Reserve. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 189, 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.024

Zapata Arango, P. C. (2019). Composición y estructura del Dosel de Sombra en sistemas agroforestales con café de tres municipios de Cundinamarca, Colombia

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Muñoz-Chamba, L., & Saritama, S. (2025). Potential forest species as agroforestry components on Coffea arabica L., farms at two altitudinal levels in the Palanda canton. CEDAMAZ, 15(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.54753/cedamaz.v15i1.2368

Issue

Section

Review Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.