El paradigma pragmático como fundamento epistemológico de la investigación mixta. Revisión sistematizada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54753/eac.v12i2.2020Palabras clave:
pragmatism, paradigms, research approaches, mixed methods, systematized reviewResumen
El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la presencia del paradigma pragmático en la literatura científica y su reciente consolidación como fundamento epistemológico de los métodos mixtos o enfoque mixto en la investigación social con la finalidad de contribuir con la difusión de las bases epistémicas que le brindan soporte a la investigación mixta. La metodología utilizada fue larevisión sistematizada de libros y documentos indexados en las bases de datos Web of Science(WOS) y Scopus mediante el uso de palabras clave relacionadas directamente con la pregunta de investigación. Para cumplir con los criterios de inclusión preestablecidos, fueron analizados 24artículos, 6 libros y 2 capítulos de libros publicados entre 2007 y 2023. Los principales resultadosreflejan un consenso entre los autores respecto a la preeminencia del pragmatismo como sustento del enfoque mixto. Las conclusiones confirman el reconocimiento universal del paradigma pragmático en la investigación social con métodos mixtos.Citas
Adu-Gyamfi, S. (2017). Current research paradigms for knowledge production in west Africa. The Print Culture in Africa View project The European Union and the Balkan Question View project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316788688_
CURRENT_RESEARCH_PARADIGMS_FOR_KNOWLEDGE_PRODUCTION_IN_WEST_AFRICA
Åkerblad, L.; Seppänen-Järvelä, R. y Haapakoski, K. (2021). Integrative Strategies in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(2), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820957125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820957125
Allemang, B.; Sitter, K. y Dimitropoulos, G. (2022). Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient-oriented research. In Health Expectations, 25(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13384
Baškarada, S. y Koronios, A. (2018). A philosophical discussion of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research in social science. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(1), 2-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-17-00042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-17-00042
Brierley, J. A. (2017). The role of a pragmatist paradigm when adopting mixed methods in behavioural accounting research. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 6(2), 140. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbaf.2017.086432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBAF.2017.086432
Briones, G. (1998). La investigación social y educativa. Convenio Andrés Bello.
Coates, A. (2021). The Prevalence of Philosophical Assumptions Described in Mixed Methods Research in Education. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820958210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820958210
Codina, L. (2020). Revisiones sistematizadas en Ciencias Humanas y Sociales. 3: Análisis y Síntesis de la información cualitativa. En C. Lopezosa, J. Díaz-Noci y L. Codina, (Ed.) Anuario de Métodos de Investigación en Comunicación Social 1. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 50-60. https://doi.org/10.31009/methodos.2020.i01.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31009/methodos.2020.i01.05
Cook, T.D., y Reichardt, CH. (1986). Métodos cuantitativos y cualitativos en investigación evaluativa. Morata.
Creswell, J.W. y Creswell, J.D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications. (Trabajo original publicado en 2009).
Creswell, J. W. y Piano, V. L. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research 3rd ed. SAGE Publications.
Durkheim, E. (2012). El suicidio. Akal.
Echevarría, H. (2017). Los fundamentos epistemológicos de los métodos mixtos. CRONÍA, 13, 10-18. http://www2.hum.unrc.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/cronia/article/view/638/544
Feilzer, M. (2010). Doing Mixed Methods Research Pragmatically: Implications for the Rediscovery of Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809349691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809349691
Forni, P. y De Grande, P. (2020). Triangulación y métodos mixtos en las ciencias sociales contemporáneas. Revista mexicana de sociología, 82(1), 159-189. https://doi.org/10.22201/iis.01882503p.2020.1.58064
Ghiara, V. (2020). Disambiguating the Role of Paradigms in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 11-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818819928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818819928
Goldkuhl, G. (2012). Design Research in Search for a Paradigm: Pragmatism Is the Answer. In: Helfert, M. & Donnellan, B. (eds) Practical Aspects of Design Science. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 286. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33681-2_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33681-2_8
Guba, E. y Lincoln, Y. (2002). Paradigmas en competencia en la investigación cualitativa. En C. Derman y J. Haro (comps.), Por los rincones. Antología de métodos cualitativos en la investigación social (pp. 113-145). El Colegio Sonora.
Guerrero-Castañeda, R., Prado, M., y Ojeda-Vargas, M. (2016). Reflexión crítica epistemológica sobre métodos mixtos en investigación de enfermería. Enfermería Universitaria, 13(4), 246–252. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reu.2016.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reu.2016.09.001
Hernández-Sampieri, R. y Mendoza, C. (2019). Metodología de la investigación. McGraw-Hill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29057/esat.v5i10.3280
Howell Smith, M. C., & Shanahan Bazis, P. (2021). Conducting Mixed Methods Research Systematic Methodological Reviews: A Review of Practice and Recommendations. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(4), 546-566. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820967626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820967626
Johnson, R. B. y Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm whose time has come. 33(7), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Johnson, R. B.; Onwuegbuzie, A. J. y Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
Kankam, P. K. (2019). The use of paradigms in information research. Library & Information Science Research, 41(2), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.04.003
Kaushik, V. y Walsh, C. A. (2019). Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for Social Work research. Social Sciences, 8(9).https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090255
Kelly, L. M. y Cordeiro, M. (2020). Three principles of pragmatism for research on organizational processes. Methodological Innovations, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799120937242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799120937242
Kelly, M.; Dowling, M. y Millar, M. (2018). The search for understanding: the role of paradigms. Nurse Researcher, 25(4), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2018.e1499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2018.e1499
Kivunja, C. y Kuyini, A. (2017). Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26-41. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26
Koetting, R. (1984). Foundations of naturalistic inquiry: Developing a theory base for understanding individual interpretations of reality. Annual Meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Dallas, Texas.
Kumatongo, B. y Muzata, K. (2021). Research paradigms and designs with their application in education. Journal of Lexicography and Terminology, 5(1), 16–32. https://journals.unza.zm/index.php/jlt/article/view/551/482
Kuhn, T. (2004). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Lynam, T.; Damayanti, R.; Rialine Titaley, C.; Suharno, N.; Bradley, M. y Krentel, A. (2020). Reframing Integration for Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(3), 336–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819879352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819879352
Maarouf, H. (2019). Pragmatism as a Supportive Paradigm for the Mixed Research Approach: Conceptualizing the Ontological, Epistemological, and Axiological Stances of Pragmatism. International Business Research, 12(9), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v12n9p1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v12n9p1
Mendizábal, N. (2018). La osadía en la investigación: el uso de los Métodos Mixtos en las ciencias sociales. Espacio Abierto Cuaderno Venezolano de Sociología, 27(2), 5-20. https://bit.ly/3N0nNw9
Migiro, S. y Magangi, B. (2011). Mixed methods: A review of literature and the future of the new research paradigm. African Journal of Business Management, 5(10), 3757-3764. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM09.082
Mitchell, A. (2018). A Review of Mixed Methods, Pragmatism and Abduction Techniques. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 16(3), 103–116. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejbrm/article/view/1378/1341
Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained: Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292462
Morgan, D. L. (2022). Paradigms in Mixed Methods Research. In D. L. Morgan (ed.). The Routledge Handbook for Advancing Integration in Mixed Methods Research. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429432828-10
Morgan, D. L. (2020). Pragmatism as a basis for grounded theory. Qualitative Report, 25(1), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.3993 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.3993
Morgan, D. L. (2014a). Pragmatism as a Paradigm for Mixed Methods Research. In Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach, 25-44. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544304533.n2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544304533.n2
Morgan, D. L. (2014b). Pragmatism as a Paradigm for Social Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(8), 1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413513733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413513733
Parada Silva, J. A. (2020). Genealogía del pragmatismo: postulados principales y sus representantes. Amauta, 18(36), 149-188. https://doi.org/10.15648/am.36.2020.2685
Pardo Rodríguez, I. (2011). ¿Necesitamos bases filosóficas y epistemológicas para la investigación con Métodos Combinados? Empiria. Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, 0(22), 91. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.22.2011.86 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.22.2011.86
Parvaiz, G.; Mufti, O. y Wahab, M. (2016), Pragmatism for Mixed Method Research at Higher Education Level. Business & Economic Review, 8(2), 67-79. https://DOI:10.22547/BER/8.2.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22547/BER/8.2.5
Picasso, F. y De Gracia, D. (2021). Revisión, crítica e innovación en las clasificaciones de paradigmas en ciencias sociales. Revista Latinoamericana de Metodología de la Investigación Social - ReLMIS, 21(11), 7-22. https://relmis.com.ar/ojs/index.php/relmis/article/view/revision_critica_e_innovacion/183
Revez, J. y Borges, L. (2019). Pragmatic paradigm in information science research. Qualitative And Quantitative Methods In Libraries, 7(4), 583-593. https://www.qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/504/497
Ryan, G. S. (2018). Introduction to positivism, interpretivism and critical theory. Nurse Researcher, 25(4), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2018.e1466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2018.e1466
Sahin, M. D. y Öztürk, G. (2019). Mixed method research: Theoretical foundations, designs and its use in educational research. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 6(2), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.574002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.574002
Sandín, M. P. (2003). Investigación cualitativa en educación. McGraw-Hill.
Shah, S.; Shah, A. y Khaskhelly, N. (2018). Pragmatism Research Paradigm: A Philosophical Framework of Advocating Methodological Pluralism in Social Science Research. Grassroots, 52(1), 246-260. https://sujo.usindh.edu.pk/index.php/Grassroots/article/view/1177/974
Shan, Y. (2022). Philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. Philosophy Compass, 17(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12804 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12804
Shan, Y. (2023). Assessing Philosophical Foundations of Mixed Methods Research. En Y. Shan (Ed.). Philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. Dialogues between researchers and philosophers. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003273288
Siddiqui, S. (2019). Research paradigms their assumptions and relevance. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 9(5), 245-265. https://www.ijmra.us/project%20doc/2019/IJRSS_MAY2019/IJMRA-15497.pdf
Tashakkori, A.; Johnson, R. B. y Teddlie, C. (2020). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. SAGE Publications.
Timans, R.; Wouters, P. y Heilbron, J. (2019). Mixed methods research: what it is and what it could be. Theory and Society, 48(2), 193-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-019-09345-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-019-09345-5
Valles, M. (2003). Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social. Síntesis.
Yepes-Nuñez, J.; Urrutia, G.; Romero-García, M. y Alonso-Fernández, S. (Trads.) (2021). Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas. Rev Española de Cardiología. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016
Williams, R. T. (2020). The Paradigm Wars: Is MMR Really a Solution? American Journal of Trade and Policy, 7(3), 79-84. https://doi.org/10.18034/ajtp.v7i3.507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18034/ajtp.v7i3.507
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Universidad Nacional de Loja
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
